Understanding The Times - What is Truth?
Understanding
the times – What is Truth?
John
Amalraj K
Published in AIM magazine of EFI –April 2019
Issue
“What is truth” asked Pontius Pilate at the trial of Jesus. But Pilate did not do anything beyond that to
find out the truth. On the other hand
insecure of his own political position, he went ahead and condemned an innocent
man to death on the cross. (Jn 18:38).
The religious authorities like the chief priest and the elders conspired
together to bring false accusations, false testimony and in the end spread a
false story on the resurrection of Jesus.
When the guards who witnessed the resurrection reported to the Chief
priests everything that happened, they bribed the soldiers and told them to
spread a rumor that the disciples came
during the night and stole him away, while we were asleep. (Matt 28:11-15). Matthew goes on to say that this false story
was widely circulated among the Jews even when he was writing the gospel
narrative. Luke writes that Jesus himself gave many convincing proofs that he
was alive. (Acts 1:3) After much
academic and historical scrutiny and witnesses who died defending the truth of
the resurrection of Jesus, we still have many ‘doubters’. Jesus taught his disciples that if you know the truth, the truth will set
you free (Jn 8:32).
We now live in an era of
post-truth. Some argue that it was post
modernists who deconstructed truth to bring us into a society – where we end up
questioning historical facts that have been believed for long. (https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/5296/have-postmodernist-thinkers-deconstructed-truth) Steph Curry, a famous basket ball player in
the US, publicly commented that he has doubts whether man actually landed on
the moon. More than 50 years after the
landing of Neil Armstrong on the moon, we have people who believe it was all a
conspiracy and fake news. NASA is trying
its best to put out more evidences of the moon landing for ‘doubters’ (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/steph-curry-doubts-u-s-landed-men-moon-nasa-wants). From creation, human beings have questioned
the truth, distorted truth and denied truth.
It is in our human nature to instantly believe what is false and refuse
to believe truth.
Fake News: A recent survey by
Microsoft Company warns that India has the largest circulation of fake
news. The survey reported that more than
60% of Indians have claimed to have seen fake news online against the global
average of 57%. The survey also found
out that the spread of online risks is more by the family and friends circle than
others. The problem of misinformation
and fake news in India is real. Last
year BBC research also reported that nationalism was driving the furry of fake
news in India (https://www.businessinsider.in/india-has-more-fake-news-than-any-other-country-in-the-world). One of the report said that since the year
2015 more than 90 people were killed by mob lynching due to the spread of fake
news circulated on whatsapp by cow vigilantes and others. (https://www.thequint.com/quintlab/lynching-in-india)
Rumours of kidnappers entering the
village ended up in the lynching of two innocent men from the neighbouring
region and turned ordinary villagers into murderers. Fake news on vaccinations resulted in one
district in Kerala where parents refused to vaccinate their children based on
rumours risking the health and well being of their beloved children (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45140158). The government has now brought in several
measures to contain fake news from spreading.
Recently the social media like whatsapp have taken steps to monitor the
spread of fake news and limited ‘forwards’ to just a few.
A political analyst Yatish
Rajawat writes in an article social media is very powerful much more than the
traditional media to sway public opinion.
Politicians in recent elections in India and in many other countries
have successfully used the social media to win elections. Just public outrage is not enough to stop
the spread of fake news. Hate content or motivated content combined with the power
and the reach of social media can sway the narratives unless self regulation or
governmental regulation is brought into force (http://www.forbesindia.com/blog/public-good/to-stop-fake-news-outrage-is-not-enough).
False Accusations, Witnesses
and Evidences: The trial of Jesus by Herod and Pilate was a
mockery of all that the Mosaic Law believed by the Jews and the Roman laws laid
down by the empire. The Mosaic Law especially the ‘ten
commandments’ specifically mentions that God’s people were told not to give
false testimony against their neighbours (Ex 20:16). The Roman Empire boasted itself of its
process of justice given to its citizens.
Yet the chief priests and the elders plotted together to bring false
accusations, witnesses and evidences against Jesus (Matt 26:57-67). Justice was denied to Jesus. Joseph was falsely accused by Potiphar’s wife
and had to spend many years in prison before he was released (Gen 39). The prophets of the Old Testament and the
apostles in the early church have often faced false accusations and had to
defend themselves. Many were killed
because of false accusations. The story
continues.
In today’s world, accusations of mismanagement, corruption, exploitation,
nepotism can easily be spread using social media. This leads to character assassination of
individuals and institutions. A few
decades ago, a famous cricketer Kapil Dev was falsely accused of engaging in match
fixing. He broke down on national
television when responding to the allegations and defending himself. A tearful Kapil Dev has said that a
lifetime of his service to cricket ``has been finished by an irresponsible
allegation of match-fixing by third parties''. He said ``I will commit suicide
rather than take a bribe''. (https://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/2000/05/07/stories)
In the end, he was vindicated but his
image was tarnished by those who spread the news. There are many such stories of those who have
been successful but targeted by others out of jealousy by making false
accusations.
The Indian court of law follows
the British tradition by asking every ‘witness’ who is to depose in the court to
take an oath in the name of God saying that they will “state the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. There are many documents in which solemn
affirmations, affidavits, self-attestations and declarations are made by us in
the course of our daily life – that many times we forget the Scripture not to
speak a lie, give any false evidence or make false declarations.
The high profile murder case in Delhi of model Jessica Lal was an
illustration of how the convicts were able to intimidate the witnesses to their
advantage resulting in the High Court delivering a judgment saying that the
convict was ‘not guilty’ based on the witnesses and evidences produced in
court. The murder was in 1999 and the
judgment in 2006 acquitting all the accused.
Public outrage, mass protest ensured that the High court had to reopen
the investigation and trial. Finally the
accused were awarded life terms in the year 2013. The false witnesses were prosecuted by the
courts later. There are thousands of
court cases that do not have the media attention and succumb to false witnesses
and evidences.
Freedom & Limitations: The
constitution of India provides freedom of speech as a fundamental right but the
right is not absolute (Article 19 of the Indian Constitution). There are restrictions placed on the same
that any speech that attacks the (1) the sovereignty and integrity of India, (2)
the security of the State, (3) friendly relations with foreign States, (4)
public order, (5) decency, (6) morality, (7) contempt of court, (8) defamation
and (9) incitement to an offence etc., (https://www.livelaw.in/columns/does-the-constitution-protect-fake-news-142596
). Governments around the world have
reacted to this menace of fake news in different ways. Malaysia enacted a law that made the spread
of fake news a criminal offence. It
raised a huge controversy since there was no proper definition of what is ‘fake
news’ resulting in the likelihood of authorities abusing such power for their
own agendas. The European Union has
brought in regulations but encouraged individuals and companies to impose self
regulation. The US government is investing
in technology that can detect false information at the source. The Indian government made an attempt to bring
a new regulation but had to withdraw the same due to the controversial clauses
introduced. Last year, in a famous
incident an actor cum politician was accused of sharing a derogatory
Facebook post on women journalists and the Madras High Court refused to grant
anticipatory bail. (https://www.livelaw.in/forwarding-social-media-posts-equal-to-endorsing-it-madras-hc-denies-anticipatory-bail-
/ )
Legal Provisions: The provisions under the Indian Penal Code
make any spread of false information that results in violence or breakdown in
the law and order situation where a criminal action can be initiated by the
authorities on a complaint. When there
is character assassination, spreading mis-information and rumour mongering
those who are affected must act to protect themselves. The Indian Penal Code provides a process to
prosecute people for defamation as a criminal act under the section 499 and 500. There are provisions under the law of torts
for claiming monetary compensation for defamation as a civil action. Defamation
cases are sometimes used by the powerful to intimidate people who speak the
truth and suppress their voice. But at
the same time it is a provision for those who are falsely accused to defend
themselves.
The Information Technology Act passed in 2000 has provided for action
against those misusing electronic devices to spread fake news, make false
accusations and provide false evidences.
These are used along with the Indian Penal Code depending on the gravity
of the action. Many cities have cyber
police appointed and complaints can be made to them to take action against
unlawful activities.
The Indian Penal Code section 193 deals with the issues of false
witnesses and false evidences. But it
has been very rare that the courts have taken action against individuals who
bear false witness or false evidences. A
situation has also risen when witnesses do not come forward to speak the truth
as they are intimidated by powerful politicians and anti-social elements and
are threatened with death. Witnesses
turn hostile in many cases because of lack of police protection. In a high profile case from Gujarat called
‘best bakery case’ many witnesses turned hostile and the Human Rights
Commission and the Supreme Court had to intervene in the matter. Many witnesses in criminal cases have been
killed since the protection of witnesses is very weak in our nation. Finally in December 2018, the Supreme Court
approved a ‘witness protection scheme’ and asked the governments to follow it
until the same is made into a law. (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/india-witness-scheme-programme-supreme-court-)
False Prophets: The
church has been faced with its own unique problem. The increase of false prophets who sway the
believers with half-truths and false doctrines have become a menace. King Ahab of Israel wanted to wage war
against the King of Aram. When the young
King Jehoshaphat of Judah came to visit him, he asked him to partner in this
battle. King Jehoshaphat asked the King
of Israel to seek the counsel of God through a prophet before going into
battle. King of Israel summoned his
prophets who numbered around 400. They all
prophesied “the Lord will give it into the king’s hand”. But King Jehoshaphat realized that these were
false prophets. So he persisted and
found the one true prophet Micaiah, son of Imlah. However King Ahab hated him for telling the
truth. Reluctantly the King sent for
him. Many advised the prophet Micaiah to
speak favourably to the King and speak success.
But the prophet Micaiah said that he will only speak what the Lord tells
him. The prophet prophesied death of King Ahab during the battle and was
promptly put into prison. Prophets were
known to be either true prophets or false prophets depending on their
predictions of the near future. Surely,
Prophet Micaiah was justified and proved to be a true prophet in Israel (1
Kings 22:1-28).
Jesus warned his disciples that in the last days there will be many false
prophets and false messiahs who will come in sheep clothing to deceive all the
people even the elect by performing signs and wonders (Matt 7:15;
24:11-24). Peter warned that there will
be false prophets and false teachers who will secretly introduce destructive
heresies and deny the lordship of Jesus (2 Peter 2:1). Apostle John warned that we are not to
believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God,
because there are many false prophets (1 Jn 4:1).
Let us watch out for false prophets among us who attempt to deceive
us. We need to be like the Jews in
Berea. Luke writes that the Berean
Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received
the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see
if what Paul said was true (Acts 17:11)
Prophetic Voice: The church is called to be a prophetic voice
to our nation. We the Christians are
called to speak the truth in love to our nation (Eph 4:15). As the general elections in India draw near,
it is the calling of those who worship and follow Jesus Christ to discern the
truth from the false. We are called to
bear testimony in a world that wants to believe in fake news. Paul warned the early believers of falling
into the trap of indulging in gossips within the faith community. He lists gossip as one of the sins that
believers must be wary of (Rom 1:29; 2 Cor 12:20). Proverbs exhorts us that without wood a fire goes out; without a gossip a quarrel dies down (Prov
26:20). The scripture taught God’s
people not to spread false reports or be a malicious witness, or follow the
crowd in doing a wrong, or give testimony in court to side with the crowd (Ex
23:1-3).
We have a responsibility to stop
fake news and information from spreading.
We need to take pre-caution when
we use social media and not become instruments that spread false news and
accusations. A popular saying “See no evil, speak no evil and hear no evil”
is helpful. Paul exhorts the early
Christians by writing “Finally,
brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely,
whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such
things.” (Phil 4:8).
John Amalraj, studied Law, Management and
Theology and has served in corporate and mission organization leadership for
more than 25 years. He lives with his
family in Pune and reflects on leadership and current affairs to serve as a
resource person for churches and missions at large.
The views expressed in this article reflect the author’s personal
opinions and are not necessarily the views of the publisher, editor or any of
the associated church, society, institution or organization.
Comments
Post a Comment